Calcutta High Court

CIVIL APPEAL None on 17 June 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION [CENTRAL EXCISE] ORIGINAL SIDE

CEXA/21/2009

IA NO: GA/3/2011(Old No:GA/3484/2011), GA/4/2011(Old No:GA/3485/2011) COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HALDIA VS

HARI & MAHESH (P) LTD.

BEFORE : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- THE HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS) Date : 4[th] April, 2025.

Ms.Manasi Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. B. Mukherjee, Adv. …for appellant.

The Court : Heard Ms. Manasi Mukherjee, learned standing counsel for the appellant/department.

Two applications have been filed by the appellant in GA/3/2011 (Old No.GA/3484/2011] and GA/4/2011 (Old No.GA/3485/2011) with prayer to set aside the order passed by the Division Bench dated 17.6.2009 refusing to condone the delay of 30 days in filing the appeal. Despite diligent search the department has not been able to trace the original applications in GA/3/2011 and GA/4/2011.

The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/department is granted leave to reconstruct the papers and the same shall be treated as original until the original applications are traced out. In addition, the appellant/department shall serve notice on the respondent and file an affidavit of service.

List the matter after four weeks.

.

(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE

(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead