Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs JAGJIT SINGH on 17 October 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHANDIGARH

TRANSFER APPLICATION NO.6/2021

PRESIDED OVER BYMRIDULESH KUMAR SINGH

DATE OF INSTITUTION: 05.05.2021

DATE OF DECISION: 17.10.2024

Punjab National Bank, a Body Corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970

having its Head Office at Plot No.4, Sector 10, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075 and having its branch Office at different places including one at Hari Ke Kalan, Tehsil & District Muktsar Sahib (PB) through its General Power of Attorney holder Sh. Deepak Kumar Jha

……..Applicant

Versus

Sh. Jagjit Singh, S/o Sh. Baldev Singh R/o Village and P.O. Khokhar, Tehsil & District Sri Muktsar Sahib.

….……Defendant

Advocates:

Argued by Sh. Ankit Kaushal, Advocate for the applicant Defendant is ex-parte

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

FINAL ORDER

1. Present Transfer Application was instituted by the applicant under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, against the defendants for recovery of Rs.21,85,062.00p (Rupees Twenty One Lacs Eighty Five Thousand Sixty Two Only). The Transfer Application has been filed through Sh. Deepak Kumar Jha, Branch Manager of the applicant, who is competent to institute the Transfer Application vide General Power of Attorney dated 10.11.2016, which is Annexure A1 to this TA.

2. The brief facts of the TA are that the defendant had approached the applicant for the grant of KCC Limit of Rs.13.00 Lacs vide Loan application dated 18.08.2015, which is Annexure A2 to this TA.

3. The applicant sanctioned KCC Limit of Rs.13.00 Lacs vide Sanction Letter dated 18.08.2015, which is Annexure A3 to this TA and the terms and conditions were duly accepted by the defendant.

4. Defendant had mortgaged his immovable property i.e. total land measuring 48 Kanal 0 Marla detailed as: a. land measuring 18 Kanal 2 Marla situated at Village Chak Khokhar, Hadbast No.70, Tehsil & District Sri Muktsar Sahib b. land measuring 29 Kanal 18 Marla situated at Village Khokhar, Hadbast No.71, Tehsil & District Sri Muktsar Sahib vide Letter to Sub Registrar for creation of charge bearing vasika no.1091 and Declaration U/s 4(1) both dated 26.08.2015, which is Annexure A5 to this TA. Documents executed:- Hypothecation Deed dated 16.09.2015, which is Annexure A4 to this TA; Copy of Notice dated 07.01.2020, which is Annexure A6 to this TA; Balance and Security Confirmation Letters both dated 31.05.2016 and 23.04.2019, which are Annexures A7 & A8 to this TA and Statement of Account with Certificate, which are Annexures A9 & A10 to this TA.

5. The loan account became irregular and was classified as NPA and after adjusting debit and credit entries in loan account there was a debit of Rs.21,85,062.00p, which is recoverable and the defendant was served recall notices but they did not repay the outstanding amount, therefore, the applicant requested to accept the application and to issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

6. The defendant was served notices to appear before this Tribunal. Sh. Kulbir Singh Sekhon, Advocate appeared on behalf of defendant and filed Memo of Appearance bot did not filed Power of Attorney. Since no one appeared on behalf of defendant, he was proceeded ex-parte on 09.10.2024.

7. In support of the TA, affidavit of Sh. Deepak Kumar Jha, Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank has been filed.

8. Heard arguments and perused record.

9. It was argued by learned counsel that in view of the documentary evidence brought on record which had gone unrebutted, the applicant had proved its case. From the perusal of all the

Annexures A1 to A10 to this TA, it is proved that the defendant approached applicant for availing of the loan facility which was granted to him and for that he had executed all the relevant documents in favour of the bank. The defendant failed to pay back the loan as per terms and conditions of the agreement between the parties. Subsequently, account of the defendant was classified as NPA. From the documentary evidence brought on record, it is proved that applicant is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.21,85,062.00p (Rupees Twenty One Lacs Eighty Five Thousand Sixty Two Only) along with interest from the defendant, from the date of filing of the present Transfer Application till realization of the account.

10. In so far as pendent elite and future rate of interest is concerned, the applicant in relief clause has claimed interest @11.50%p.a. plus penal interest @2.00%p.a. with yearly rests from 01.04.2021 till the realization.

The Tribunal is of the considered opinion that sometimes in appropriate cases the prerogative of mercy is the brightest jewel in the crown of the Judge. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the instant case including nature of the mortgaged property, undertaking of the defendant, quantum of loan and prevalent market rates of interest which have gone drastically downhill in yester years, while exercising the discretion vested in this Tribunal, this Tribunal deems it just and appropriate to grant uniform simple interest @08.00%p.a. in the loan account from the date of filing of the TA till realization of the amount ordered vide this final order. It is ordered accordingly.

11. In the result, the application is allowed declaring that the defendant is liable to pay to the applicant a total sum of Rs.21,85,062.00p (Rupees Twenty One Lacs Eighty Five Thousand Sixty Two Only) with costs, current and future simple interest @08.00%p.a. in the loan account from the date of filing of TA till the date of realization of the amount. Accordingly, the applicant shall be entitled to recover aforesaid amount from the sale of hypothecated/mortgaged properties of the defendants in execution proceedings if not sold earlier under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. If the dues of the still remain unsatisfied, it shall be entitled to recover the same by attachment and sale of personal assets of the defendants. The applicant is at liberty to enforce the claim through due process of law.

12. Any other application pending stands disposed of.

13. Issue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

14. Parties to appear before Learned Recovery Officer of this Tribunal on 28.10.2024.

15. Copy of this order be given dasti to the applicant and be sent to defendants through registered/speed post and this order be also uploaded on the official website of this Tribunal and record be consigned. Pronounced by me in the open Tribunal. Dated: 17.10.2024.

(MRIDULESH KUMAR SINGH) Presiding Officer, DRT-III, Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead