Rajasthan High Court
CW/9405/2026 of VIKAS GURJAR S/O CHIRANJI LAL GURJAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 9 September 2026
2026:RJ-JP:36406
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9405/2026 CNR: RJHC020503652026 | URN: CW / 21040U / 2026 1. Vikas Gurjar S/o Chiranji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village And Post Ancher, Encher, Chouth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan- 322703. 2.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9405/2026
CNR: RJHC020503652026 | URN: CW / 21040U / 2026
1.
Vikas Gurjar S/o Chiranji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village And Post Ancher, Encher, Chouth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan- 322703.
2.
Kuldeep Singh S/o Shivraj Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village And Post Tighariya, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan- 322254.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.
Principal Secretary, Department Of Administrative Reforms, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4.
Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Shreeji Nagar, Prithviraj Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9543/2026
CNR: RJHC020513692026 | URN: CW / 21371U / 2026
Bhupendra Gurjar S/o Shri Mahesh Kumar Gurjar, Aged About 32
Years, Resident Of 278/a, Nhargarh Kile Ke Niche, Bara Mori, Meena Para Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan Jaipur.
2.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
Page 1 of 3
(2 of 3)
[CW-9405/2026]
3.
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary, Having Its Office At Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Harendar Neel with
Mr. Rohan Gupta in CW No.9405/2026
Mr. M.F. Baig in CW No.9543/2026
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Punit Singhvi
Mr. Yuvraj Samant with
Ms. Neha Amola and
Mr. Tilak Vaid for RSSB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
09/09/2026
1. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners for allowing them relaxation, in view of Rule 22(ii)(c) of the Rajasthan Secretariat Ministerial Services (Amendment) Rules 2023, (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘Rules of 2023’) for the recruitment to the post of Stenographer.
2. As per Rule 22(ii)(c) of the Rules of 2023, the Board will not recommend any candidate who makes more than 20% mistakes/error in the paper opted in Phase-II of the competitive examination for the post of Stenographer. However, relaxation in maximum permissible mistakes/error in paper opted in Phase-II up to 5% shall be available to Scheduled Castes and Schedule Tribes category candidates.
3. The main prayer in these petitions is for issuance of directions to the respondents to allow 5% relaxation, in view of Rule 22(ii)(c) of the Rules of 2023.
Page 2 of 3
(3 of 3) [CW-9405/2026]
4. The learned counsels for the respondents state that after allowing 5% relaxation, they have issued a list of provisionally qualified candidates, which also includes names of the present petitioners and have been called for document verification. It is also submitted that after extending 5% relaxation and document Verification, the eligible candidates would be declared selected on the basis of merit as per the merit criteria provided under the said Rules and the terms and conditions of the advertisement.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsels for respondents, submits that these writ petitions may be disposed of at this stage, in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents.
6. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of and the respondents may proceed ahead with the recruitment process for making selection and appointment.
7. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioners feel aggrieved by any further action of the respondents, they would be at liberty to file fresh petition.
8. The stay applications and pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
9. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 102-103/ARTI SHARMA
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…