Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/13646/2026 of MOOLCHAND S/O GHANSHYAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 9 September 2026

2026:RJ-JP:36296

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13646/2026 CNR: RJHC020840922026 | URN: CRLMB / 25283U / 2026 Moolchand S/o Ghanshyam, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Lalgawn, Police Station Sunel, District Jhalawar, (Rajasthan). (Presently Confined At Central

[2026:RJ-JP:36296]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13646/2026

CNR: RJHC020840922026 | URN: CRLMB / 25283U / 2026

Moolchand S/o Ghanshyam, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Lalgawn, Police Station Sunel, District Jhalawar, (Rajasthan). (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Jhalawar).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Akanksha Saxena

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with

Mr. Sapan Soni

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

09/09/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.44/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar for offence under Section 316(2) of BNS, 2023.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that no amount has been transferred in favour of the present petitioner. The matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 04.08.2026 without any criminal past. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served

Page 1 of 2

[2026:RJ-JP:36296] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13646/2026] by keeping the petitioner in further custody consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Moolchand S/o Ghanshyam, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 49/RASHMI

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead