Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/13972/2026 of SATYANARAYAN ALIAS SONU S/O KHEMRAJ Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 8 September 2026

2026:RJ-JP:36111

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13972/2026 CNR: RJHC020863572026 | URN: CRLMB / 25838U / 2026 Satyanarayan Alias Sonu S/o Khemraj, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Amarpura, Mngrole, Police Station Mangrole, District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present

[2026:RJ-JP:36111]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13972/2026

CNR: RJHC020863572026 | URN: CRLMB / 25838U / 2026

Satyanarayan Alias Sonu S/o Khemraj, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Amarpura, Mngrole, Police Station Mangrole, District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Baran)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Ms. Swati Sharma for

Mr. Girish Khandelwal

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with

Mr. Sapan Soni

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

08/09/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.153/2026 registered at Police Station Mangrol, District Baran for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that a cross-case has also been registered at the instance of the petitioner’s side, in which the petitioner has also sustained injuries. He further submits that all the injuries mentioned in the FIR have been found to be neither grievous nor dangerous to life. Petitioner

Page 1 of 2

is

behind

the

bars

since 20.08.2026

[2026:RJ-JP:36111] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13972/2026] without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Satyanarayan Alias Sonu S/o Khemraj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 44/RASHMI

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead