Rajasthan High Court

CW/23319/2018 of BABU LAL JATAV S/O SHRI RAM SAHAI, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 8 September 2026

2026:RJ-JP:36233

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23319/2018 CNR: RJHC020955392018 | URN: CW / 39362U / 2018 Babu Lal Jatav S/o Shri Ram Sahai, Aged About 62 Years, By Caste Jatav, Resident Of Village And Post Suhari, Busawar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner

[2026:RJ-JP:36233]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23319/2018

CNR: RJHC020955392018 | URN: CW / 39362U / 2018

Babu Lal Jatav S/o Shri Ram Sahai, Aged About 62 Years, By Caste Jatav, Resident Of Village And Post Suhari, Busawar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan)

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur

3.

The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Distt- Bikaner

4.

The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Bharatpur

5.

District Education Officer, (D.e.o.) (Secondary Education), District Karauli (Rajasthan)

6.

Director, Pension And Welfare Department, Jyoti Nagar, Lalkothi, Jaipur-15

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Ms. Manju Chauhan, for

Mr. Arvind Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

08/09/2026

1. The matter pertains to year 2018.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded that the petitioner has retired. However, it is submitted that the issue of promotion is alive.

3. Heard.

Page 1 of 2

[2026:RJ-JP:36233] (2 of 2) [CW-23319/2018]

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to file a representation before the Respondent/competent authority, who shall consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. प. 10 (1) प्रसु./अनु.- 1/2012).

5. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

6. However, if the petitioner still has any grievance, he may avail appropriate remedy available to him under the law.

7. Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 135/SHRUTI SHARMA

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead