Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/10403/2026 of UDAIBHAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT S/O KAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 8 September 2026

2026:RJ-JP:36066

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10403/2026 CNR: RJHC020625492026 | URN: CRLMB / 19280U / 2026 Udaibhan Singh Shekhawat S/o Kan Singh Shekhawat, R/o Ward No. 06, Mau Sikar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Sikar).

[2026:RJ-JP:36066]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10403/2026

CNR: RJHC020625492026 | URN: CRLMB / 19280U / 2026

Udaibhan Singh Shekhawat S/o Kan Singh Shekhawat, R/o Ward No. 06, Mau Sikar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Sikar).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Surya Pratap Singh

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with

Mr. Sapan Soni

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

08/09/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.108/2026 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 331(6), 307, 308(2), 119(1), 324(2) and 111(2)

(b) of BNS, 2023.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the allegation levelled against the present petitioner is that he demanded a sum of Rs.50,000/- from the complainant and, upon the complainant's refusal to pay the said amount, the petitioner has taken away Rs.1,00,000/- from the money box. Nothing has

Page 1 of 2

[2026:RJ-JP:36066] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10403/2026] been recovered from his conscious possession. Petitioner is behind the bars since 14.06.2026 without any criminal past. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Udaibhan Singh Shekhawat S/o Kan Singh Shekhawat, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J RASHMI/9

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead