Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/9712/2026 of SMT. RUKKA W/O NASEEM @ NASEEN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 8 September 2026

2026:RJ-JP:36154

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9712/2026 CNR: RJHC020582222026 | URN: CRLMB / 17975U / 2026 Smt. Rukka W/o Naseem @ Naseen, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dudawal, Police Station Brijnagar, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner

[2026:RJ-JP:36154]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9712/2026

CNR: RJHC020582222026 | URN: CRLMB / 17975U / 2026

Smt. Rukka W/o Naseem @ Naseen, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dudawal, Police Station Brijnagar, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

08/09/2026

1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.197/2024 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 61(2)(a), 313 of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of IT Act, 2008.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. He again submits that co-accused Tarif has been enlarged on bail by this Court on 13.03.2026. Other co-accused Bacchusingh also got benefit of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025. He again submits that co-accused namely Aadil Khan,

Page 1 of 2

[2026:RJ-JP:36154] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9712/2026] Juned, Robdeen also got benefit of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.11.2024. The case of the present petitioner is on better footing. The petitioner is a lady, behind the bars since 04.06.2026 though five cases have been reported against her, however, in all cases, she is already on bail. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner-Smt. Rukka W/o Naseem @ Naseen, be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Rashmi/97

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead