Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11931/2026 of SABBIR S/O KUNDAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11931/2026 CNR: RJHC020718942026 | URN: CRLMB / 21988U / 2026 Sabbir S/o Kundan, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Khedli Kaji (Jhopdi), Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined
[2026:RJ-JP:35795]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11931/2026
CNR: RJHC020718942026 | URN: CRLMB / 21988U / 2026
Sabbir S/o Kundan, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Khedli Kaji (Jhopdi), Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg.
(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/09/2026
1. This criminal misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Sabbir S/o Kundan, aged about 65 years, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.4/2025 dated 02.01.2025 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 140(3), 189(2) & 307 of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the other co-accused namely Abbas has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court within 7 days from the date of filing of the application. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the parity be maintained and the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
[2026:RJ-JP:35795] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11931/2026]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that case of the petitioner is not distinguishable from the co-accused Abbas, who has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court and the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
5. This Court, after considering the nature of allegations, co- accused Abbas has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court by order dated 13.01.2025, trial will take sufficiently long time, and without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sabbir S/o Kundan shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case.
7. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case within two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 125/Monika