Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11330/2026 of AKASH SINGH S/O LATE SHRI GULAB SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 11330/2026 CNR: RJHC020678122026 | URN: CRLMB / 20932U / 2026 Akash Singh S/o Late Shri Gulab Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Naharpura, P.S. Jawaja, District Beawar. (Presently Lodged At
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
11330/2026
CNR: RJHC020678122026 | URN: CRLMB / 20932U / 2026
Akash Singh S/o Late Shri Gulab Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Naharpura, P.S. Jawaja, District Beawar. (Presently Lodged At District Jail Beawar).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jiya-Ur-Rahman
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/09/2026
1. The instant second bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 06.10.2025 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 266/2025 registered at Police Station Jawaja, District Beawer, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 333, 115(2), 126(2), 110, 118(1), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of BNS and Sections 4 and 5 of Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that during trial injured Balwant Singh has been declared hostile as he has said nothing incriminating against the accused-petitioner and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11330/2026] no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that during trial injured Balwant Singh has been declared hostile and said nothing incriminating against accused-petitioner; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Akash Singh S/o Late Shri Gulab Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11330/2026]
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in a month in the concerned police station.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 22/HEENA