Rajasthan High Court
WMAP/567/2026 of AMIT JANGID S/O SUNDAR LAL JANGID Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 567/2026 CNR: RJHC020864522026 | URN: WMAP / 1103U / 2026 1. Amit Jangid S/o Sundar Lal Jangid, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Paniyala Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli. 2. Amit Kasana S/o Jagdish Prasad Kasana, Aged About 20
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 567/2026
CNR: RJHC020864522026 | URN: WMAP / 1103U / 2026
1.
Amit Jangid S/o Sundar Lal Jangid, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Paniyala Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli.
2.
Amit Kasana S/o Jagdish Prasad Kasana, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Village Putli Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli
3.
Abhishek Gurjar S/o Shri Ramawatar, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Village Hasiyawas Nangal Panditpura Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli
4.
Aman Lawania S/o Shri Narendra Kumar, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Village Bear Bharatpur, Dist. Bharatpur.
5.
Annu Verma D/o Shri Rajesh Prajapat, Aged About 19
Years, R/o Dhani Upli Khoti Harsora Road Bansur, Dist.
Kotputli.
6.
Arju D/o Shri Arju, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Post Berdod Tehsil Behrod Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli.
7.
Saurabh Vyas S/o Shri Vishnu Vyas, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Aen Phed Sub Division Deeg, Dist. Deeg.
8.
Dharamveer S/o Shri Vijay Kumar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Nangal Chaudhary, Dist. Mahendra Garh, Haryana
9.
Gunjan Khardia D/o Shri Ramchandra Khardiya, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No 5 Village Mandawara Neem Ka Thana, Dist. Sikar.
10.
Himanshu Yadav S/o Shri Narendra Yadav, Aged About 19
Years, R/o Village Kekri, Post Gunthi Tehsil Behrod, Dist.
Kotputli.
11.
Jaswant Gurjar S/o Shri Banwari Lal Gurjar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Dabla Road Kripa Ka Tibara Kotputli, Dist.
Kotputli.
12.
Jay Koli S/o Shri Alok, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Parshuram Colony Behrawas Road Rewari, Dist Rewari, Haryana.
13.
Khamosh Gurjar S/o Shri Dhansiram Gurjar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Babria Bansur, Dist. Kotputli.
14.
Khushbu Khatik D/o Shri Himmat Khatik, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Laxmi Nagar Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli.
(2 of 5)
[WMAP-567/2026]
15.
Komal Budgaya S/o Shri Girraj Prasad, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Plot No 4 Vatika Sirsi Road Jaipur, Dist. Jaipur.
16.
Manish Jat S/o Shri Dharmaram Choudhary, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No7 Village Mawra Dist Nagaur
17.
Mohit Yadav S/o Shri Ranbir Singh Yadav, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Ward No9 Village Rodwal Neemrana, Dist.
Kotputli.
18.
Mona Yadav D/o Shri Ashok Yadav, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dhani Guliwali Bhainslana, Dist. Kotputli.
19.
Monika Rawat D/o Shri Indraj Rawat, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Paniyala Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli.
20.
Naman Saini S/o Shri Ramesh Saini, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Dhani Desawali Ward No 17, Behind Krishna Hospital Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli.
21.
Nisha Meena D/o Shri Surgyan Meena, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Ward No 7, Ringus Sikar, Dist. Sikar.
22.
Pooja Vishnoi D/o Shri Sharwan Ram, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Kanuka Nagar Fitkasni Jodhpur, Dist Jodhpur.
23.
Priti Saini D/o Shri Kishan Kumar Saini, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Jiva Ki Dhani Post Karna Tehsil Narayanpur, Dist. Kotputli.
24.
Rahul Singh S/o Shri Pruan Mal Jat, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhani Thaloda Ki Bar Nagar, Dist. Kotputli.
25.
Ritik Kumar S/o Shri Hari Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/
o Gram Rambas Hatundi Tendil Mundawar Dist Alwar.
26.
Sachin Kumar S/o Shri Pappu Ram Dumodia, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Daulat Singh Ki Dhani Bansur, Dist.
Kotputli.
27.
Sandeep Gurjar S/o Shri Tara Chand, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Doi Nagar Gram Bachi Tehsil Kootputli, Dist.
Kotputli.
28.
Santosh S/o Shri Mada Ram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Gram Meerapur Post Machi Tehsil Bansur Dist Kotputli, Dist. Kotputli
29.
Saurabh S/o Shri Jitendra Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/
o Karnikot Mjundawar, Dist. Alwar.
30.
Siddant Saini S/o Shri Dharam Pal Saini, Aged About 21
Years, R/o Dhani Dalikothi Kotputli Ward No2, Dist.
(3 of 5)
[WMAP-567/2026]
Kotputli.
31.
Sunil Kumar Saini S/o Shri Gyarsi Lal Saini, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dhani Raniwala Naredha, Dist.kotputli.
32.
Sunil Saini S/o Shri Vijendra Kumar Saini, Aged About 20
Years, R/o 42 Village Handi Anchapur Mahwa, Dist. Dosa
33.
Tanisha Tanwar D/o Shri Kaptan Singh, Aged About 19
Years, R/o Dhani Jhala Ki Dhandha Sudarpura, Dist.
Kotputli.
34.
Vishal Singh Tokas S/o Shri Dayal Singh Tokas, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No 4 Chapuda Khurd, Dist.
Jaipur
35.
Yogesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Shiv Lal Saini, Aged About 20 Years, R/o 19, Village Rampura Bansur Kotpuli, Dist.
Kotputli.
36.
Yug Prajapat S/o Shri Chothmal Prajapat, Aged About 19
Years, R/o Village Narayan Pur Dist Kotputli, Dist.
Kotputli.
37.
Yuvraj Akharia S/o Shri Leela Ram Dhobi, Aged About 21
Years, R/o Bas Borisal Narayanpur, Dist. Kotputli.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
Rajasthan University Of Health Science, Jaipur Through Its Registrar, Sector-18 Pratap Nagar Jaipur.
3.
Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar, B- 39
Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4.
Controller Of Examination, Rajasthan University Of Health Science, Jaipur, Sector-18 Kumbha Marg, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
5.
Shri Krishna College Of Nursing, Kotpootli Through Its Director, Shri Deepak Sharma S/o Late Shri Surya Prakash Sharma, Dabla Road, Near Satyam Marriage Garden, Kotpootli.
----Respondents
(4 of 5)
[WMAP-567/2026]
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Rekha Jain with Ms. Shama Khan
for Mr. M.A. Khan for RUHS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
(Through Video Conferencing)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/09/2026
1. Learned counsel Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj has filed an application for revival of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18659/2025 which was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 12.08.2026. Learned counsel has drawn attention of the Court towards para No.12 of the application which is reproduced as under : “12. That on the basis of the assurance given by the Respondent University petitioners have withdrawn their writ petition no. No.18659/2025, on dated 12.08.2026, but it was very shocking to the petitioners when they came to know about the impugned order dated 25.08.2026, Issued by the Registrar, Rajasthan University of Health Science, to the Principal of Shri Krishna College of Nursing and was provided to the petitioners by the Institution. By the aforesaid order the petitioners admitted in the course of B.Sc. nursing in academic session 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25, in Shri Krishna College of Nursing, in compliance of the interim order of the Hon'ble High Court were denied to regularize by the University.”
2. Placing reliance upon the same, it was consciously submitted that for redressal of the grievance, petitioners have filed fresh writ petition which was listed for provisional participation in the forthcoming examination. He has submitted that parallel present revival application is also filed on account of reason stated in para No.12. He has submitted that in the equal similarly situated matters, the Court has given indulgence and permitted provisional participation to the students like petitioners.
(5 of 5) [WMAP-567/2026]
3. Having heard and considered the submission, for the following reasons, the application is disposed of with the following observations:
(i) A fresh writ petition has admittedly been filed on account of subsequent developments as reiterated in para No.12 of the application.
(ii) . It is a settled position of law that two parallel remedies cannot be taken. It is also trite law that petitioners cannot be made remediless. In the facts and circumstances, the present revival application is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioners to pursue their remedy in the fresh writ petition, which has been filed by them.
(iii) . The present order and any other order will not cause any prejudice to the petitioners. They would be at liberty to argue their case in accordance with law.
4. In light of the above, present application is disposed of. Pending application, if any, is also disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J 2/Anil Choudhary/Raksha Rakhecha