Rajasthan High Court
CCP/348/2022 of UMASHANKAR GURJAR S/O SHRI HARI SINGH, Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, on 3 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 356/2022 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 676/2022 CNR: RJHC020241902022 | URN: CCP / 372U / 2022 Dheeru Singh Gurjar S/o Ramroop Gurjar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Dubbi, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 356/2022
IN
Dheeru Singh Gurjar S/o Ramroop Gurjar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Dubbi, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan- 303304.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Dr. Joga Ram, Additional Principal Secretary Cum
Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of
3.
4.
Narendra
Kumar
Verma,
Deputy
Director
(Administration), Local Self Government Department, G- 3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan.
5.
Narsi Lal Meena, Executive Officer, Municipality, Bandikui, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 348/2022
IN
Umashankar Gurjar S/o Shri Hari Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Khedla, Post Teogoan, Tehsil Nadouti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan Through Its Additional Principal
[2026:RJ-JP:35750]
(2 of 3)
[CCP-356/2022]
Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2.
Dr. Joga Ram, Additional Principal Secretary Cum
Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of
3.
4.
Narendra Kumar Verma Deputy Director (Administration), Local Self Government Department , G-3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme, Near Civil Line Phatak,
Jaipur-16, Rajasthan.
5.
Yogesh Kumar Pipal, Executive Officer, Municipality Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
IN
Pawan Gurjar S/o Ramniwas Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Banari, Bhuri-Bharaj, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Dr. Joga Ram, Additional Principal Secretary Cum
Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
3.
4.
Narendra
Kumar
Verma,
Deputy
Director
(Administration), Local Self Government Department, G- 3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan.
[2026:RJ-JP:35750]
(3 of 3)
[CCP-356/2022]
5.
Suresh Kumar Verma, Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Viratnagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Akshit Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Choudhary, and
Mr. Yadvendra Patel, for
Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/09/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that though vide Order No.6802 dated 25.05.2026 issued by the Director and Joint Secretary, Local Self Government Department, the petitioner has been reinstated, however, solely on the whims and fancies of the respondents, the compliance of the interim order dated 10.02.2022 has been made after the passage of more than four years.
2. Considering the above submissions, the order dated 25.05.2026 and also the fact that the writ petitions, wherein the interim order dated 10.02.2022 was passed by this Court, are pending, the present contempt petitions are disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all their grievances in the writ petitions.
3. With the aforesaid directions, the present contempt petitions stand disposed of.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
5. Notices stand discharged. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 40-42/VINAY