Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11499/2026 of DIVESH CHAUHAN SON OF KARANSINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 September 2026
2026:RJ-JP:35664
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11499/2026 CNR: RJHC020687742026 | URN: CRLMB / 21227U / 2026 Divesh Chauhan Son Of Karansingh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 40, Kritagya Nagar, Behind Meyo College, Ganeshnagar, Police Station
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11499/2026
CNR: RJHC020687742026 | URN: CRLMB / 21227U / 2026
Divesh Chauhan Son Of Karansingh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 40, Kritagya Nagar, Behind Meyo College, Ganeshnagar, Police Station Alwargate, Ajmer (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vishwajeet Mantri
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order
03/09/2026
1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Divesh Chauhan S/o Karansingh, under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023, who was arrested by the Police in connection with the FIR bearing No.60/2025 dated 24.02.2025 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Jaipur, Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 338, 339, 340(2), 341(1) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that allegation against him as per the FIR is that he prepared some documents way back in the year 2023 in respect of the property, for which, civil disputes are going on between them. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has not committed the
Page 1 of 3
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11499/2026] alleged offence and the documents as prepared was within the knowledge and notice of the parties. He further submits that the Police, after completing the investigation, has filed the charge- sheet on 01.09.2026 and no recovery is required to be made from him. Learned counsel further submits that the documents were prepared by the petitioner in the year 2023 and the FIR was lodged in the year 2025, for which, a civil dispute is pending before the Civil Court. He submits that the petitioner has no serious criminal antecedents except one case of the year 2023, in which he has already been enlarged on bail. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application by submitting that the petitioner prepared the documents in question in the year 2023 for which the impugned FIR was lodged against him and a civil dispute is pending before the Civil Court.
4. This Court, after considering the nature of allegations noted that the Police after completing the investigation has filed the charge-sheet and no recovery is required to be made, petitioner has no criminal antecedents, trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without commenting upon merits of the case, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Divesh Chauhan S/o Karansingh shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of ₹1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of ₹50,000/- each to the
Page 2 of 3
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11499/2026] satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 115/Monika
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…