Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8751/2026 of KASAM S/O JUHRU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 2 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8751/2026 CNR: RJHC020537182026 | URN: CRLMB / 16036U / 2026 Kasam S/o Juhru, R/o Ghatmika Police Station Pahari District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus
[2026:RJ-JP:35309]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8751/2026
CNR: RJHC020537182026 | URN: CRLMB / 16036U / 2026
Kasam S/o Juhru, R/o Ghatmika Police Station Pahari District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Arafat Hussain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
02/09/2026
1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner Kasam S/o Juhru, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.114/2013 dated 23.08.2013 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Bharatpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 332, 353, 307 of I.P.C. The bail application of the accused-petitioner was rejected by the Additional District & Sessions Judge Deeg (Raj.), vide order dated 25.05.2026. Thereafter, the accused-petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023.
2. Learned counsel submits that accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he had no information about the same. He further submits that now he has been arrested by the police in connection with the FIR of the year 2013.
[2026:RJ-JP:35309] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8751/2026] In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail and he is ready to join the investigation.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner was absconding, therefore, the charge-sheet was filed under Section 299 of Cr.P.C. He further pointed out that 15 cases are pending against the petitioner which is recorded by the learned Trial Court in the bail rejection order.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. After considering the overall facts and circumstances, serious criminal antecedents as recorded by the learned Trial Court in the bail rejection order, and the fact that the petitioner was avoiding his arrest, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the present accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Consequently, this criminal misc. bail application is hereby dismissed at this stage. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 141/RINCHU