Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/12576/2026 of JAGDISH S/O HEMRAJ Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 2 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12576/2026 CNR: RJHC020769752026 | URN: CRLMB / 23208U / 2026 Jagdish S/o Hemraj, R/o Hukampura, P/s Kishanganj, District Baran (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail Baran). ----Petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:35445]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12576/2026
CNR: RJHC020769752026 | URN: CRLMB / 23208U / 2026
Jagdish S/o Hemraj, R/o Hukampura, P/s Kishanganj, District Baran (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail Baran).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Saurabh Jain for
Mr. Bhim Singh Meena
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP
Mr. Yatharth Agarwal for
Mr. Rohit Khandelwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
02/09/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.107/2026 registered at Police Station Kishanganj, District Baran for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 109(1) of BNS-2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that, though there is an allegation against the present petitioner of inflicting a life-threatening injury upon the injured- Kamal Meena, it is an admitted position that both parties are related to each other and share a close relationship. He submits
[2026:RJ-JP:35445] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12576/2026] that both parties have arrived at a compromise, and in support of his contention, he has filed a compromise, which is taken on record. The petitioner is behind bars since 16.06.2026 and has no criminal antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned counsel for the complainant has conceded to the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, admitted the factum of the compromise, and has raised no objection to the grant of bail to the present petitioner.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Jagdish S/o Hemraj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 59/RASHMI