Rajasthan High Court
CW/787/2002 of SITA RAM SETHI Vs STATE on 2 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 787/2002 CNR: RJHC020221912002 | URN: CW / 1162U / 2002 Sita Ram Son of Shri Ram Pal Ji Sethi, aged about 56 years, Resident of 81, Janakpuri-II, Imli Wala Phatak, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan Through
[2026:RJ-JP:35282]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 787/2002
CNR: RJHC020221912002 | URN: CW / 1162U / 2002
Sita Ram Son of Shri Ram Pal Ji Sethi, aged about 56 years, Resident of 81, Janakpuri-II, Imli Wala Phatak, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through Secretary to the Govt. of Rajasthan, Ministry of Law.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
None Present
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Yash Joshi, AAAG &
Ms. Monisha Agarwal, Adv. for
Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
02/09/2026
1. By way of filing this writ petition, petitioner has challenged order dated 04.01.2002, whereby petitioner was allegedly reverted from the post of Joint Legal Remembrancer to the post of Deputy Legal Remembrancer.
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. The aforesaid matter is listed in the category of oldest matter with a note in the cause list that such matter shall not be adjourned.
3. Heard learned counsel for the respondent.
4. Learned counsel submitted that initially, the petitioner was promoted on the post of Joint Legal Remembrancer subject to review/revision provisionally and while conducting review/revision, it was found that two more persons, who were senior to the petitioner were left from being considered for promotion on the
[2026:RJ-JP:35282] (2 of 2) [CW-787/2002] post of Joint Legal Remembrancer, hence, their claims were better than the claim of the petitioner for promotion on the post of Joint Legal Remembrancer.
5. Learned counsel submits that in view of above, the petitioner was rightly posted again on the post of Deputy Legal Remembrancer.
6. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent, this Court does not find any ground to interfere in the instant writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J 2/Jatin