Rajasthan High Court

CRLAS/1685/2026 of JASBEERSINGH S/O PRATAPSINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1685/2026 CNR: RJHC020694282026 | URN: CRLAS / 2955U / 2026 Jasbeersingh S/o Pratapsingh, Resident Of House No. 304, Patel Nagar Camp, Police Station Patel Nagar Civil Lines, District Hisar, Currently R/o 1662 C/1/15

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1685/2026

CNR: RJHC020694282026 | URN: CRLAS / 2955U / 2026

Jasbeersingh S/o Pratapsingh, Resident Of House No. 304, Patel Nagar Camp, Police Station Patel Nagar Civil Lines, District Hisar, Currently R/o 1662 C/1/15 Govinduri House No. 1/32, Street No.

04, Madhya Market Tughlakabad Extension, Police Station Govindpuri ( New Delhi) ( At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Sikar )

----Appellant

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

2.

Rakesh Kumar Son Of Suraj Mal Meena, Resident Of Arniya, Shri Madhopur, District Sikar ( Rajasthan).

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. Akshat Chaudhary

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP

Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Palia

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

02/09/2026

1. This criminal appeal under Section 14 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on behalf of the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated 07.07.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sikar (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in FIR No.149/2026 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for the offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023, whereby the trial court has dismissed the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant.

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-1685/2026]

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. Though there is an allegation in the FIR that the appellant entered into an agreement with the complainant for the construction of a house and received an advance amount, the construction was neither commenced nor was the advance amount refunded. The allegations, at their face value, disclose a dispute which is prima facie civil in nature, arising out of an alleged breach of contractual obligations. He again argued that co-accused Vipin Rao has also been enlarged on bail by this Court on 17.07.2026. The case of the appellant is akin to him. It is further submitted that the appellant has been in custody since 28.06.2026 without any criminal past. Therefore, it is prayed that the appeal presented by the present appellant may be allowed and he may be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the appeal.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act.

6. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 07.07.2026 passed by the learned trial court is set aside. It is directed that appellant- Jasbeersingh S/o Pratapsingh, shall be released on bail

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1685/2026] provided he shall execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 103/RASHMI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead