Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/9568/2026 of TASLIM S/O DEENU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9311/2026 CNR: RJHC020565852026 | URN: CRLMB / 17090U / 2026 Tohid S/o Jahir, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kaithwara, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Raj) (Presently Accused In Judicial Custody At

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9311/2026

CNR: RJHC020565852026 | URN: CRLMB / 17090U / 2026

Tohid S/o Jahir, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kaithwara, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Raj)

(Presently Accused In Judicial Custody At District Jail Deeg)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9568/2026

CNR: RJHC020571852026 | URN: CRLMB / 17771U / 2026

Taslim S/o Deenu, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dharmshala, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg (Rajasthan).

(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Azad Ahmed

Mr. Ankit Khandelwal

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

02/09/2026

1. These criminal miscellaneous bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Tohid S/o Jahir & Taslim S/o Deenu, under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.0083/2026 dated 26.05.2026 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the

(2 of 5) [CRLMB-9311/2026] offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2008. The bail applications filed by the petitioners were rejected by order dated 08.06.2026 by the Additional Session Judge, Kaman, District Deeg.

2. Learned counsel submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present cases and there are no serious allegations against them on '1930' portal. He submits that the Police, after completing the investigation, filed the charge-sheet on 26.05.2026 and no criminal antecedents are found against them. Learned counsel further submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioners are petty in nature. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the accused-petitioners be enlarged on bail, as the trial will take sufficiently long time.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail applications, however, could not dispute the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and there are no criminal antecedents of any nature in the past except 1-2 complaints on '1930', which are of petty nature.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused contents of the FIR as well as conclusion in the charge-sheet.

5. This Court, after considering the fact that the police, after completing the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet, nature of allegations, the petitioners are behind the bars since long, no serious allegations on '1930' were found against them, and therefore, without commenting upon merits of the matters, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and

(3 of 5) [CRLMB-9311/2026] deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners - Tohid S/o Jahir & Taslim S/o Deenu shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

1. Each of the accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of ₹50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused-petitioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: -

(i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioners have in their name.

(ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction statements of all of their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

3. The accused-petitioners shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer.

4. The accused-petitioners shall surrender their passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The

(4 of 5) [CRLMB-9311/2026] accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court.

5. The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO.

6. The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

7. The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners.

8. The accused-petitioners shall not create any account on social media in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

9. The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

11. The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(5 of 5) [CRLMB-9311/2026]

12. The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever.

7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bails. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 20/Monika

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead