Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/13542/2026 of SURESH KUMAR S/O SHRI MALARAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13542/2026 CNR: RJHC020833232026 | URN: CRLMB / 25040U / 2026 Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Malaram, R/o Meena Mohalla, Babai, Po- lice Station Babai, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, Presently In Ju- dicial Custody

[2026:RJ-JP:35485]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13542/2026

CNR: RJHC020833232026 | URN: CRLMB / 25040U / 2026

Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Malaram, R/o Meena Mohalla, Babai, Po­

lice Station Babai, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, Presently In Ju­

dicial Custody In Sub Jail, Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

02/09/2026

1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in Excise/FIR No.25/2025-26 registered at Police Station Excise/Excise Preventive Party, Khetri, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that two litres of illicit liquor have been recovered from the conscious possession of the present petitioner. The petitioner is behind bars since 03.08.2026 and has four criminal antecedents. The charge- sheet has been filed, and no further custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. The trial of the case will take considerable [2026:RJ-JP:35485] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13542/2026] time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Malaram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 76/Arun

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead