Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/12166/2026 of MAKSOOD KHAN S/O SHRI MAHMOOD KHAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 1 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12166/2026 CNR: RJHC020742102026 | URN: CRLMB / 22369U / 2026 Maksood Khan S/o Shri Mahmood Khan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Chediya Police Thana Anta District Baran At Present H.n. 38 Amrat Nagar Borkheda
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12166/2026
CNR: RJHC020742102026 | URN: CRLMB / 22369U / 2026
Maksood Khan S/o Shri Mahmood Khan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Chediya Police Thana Anta District Baran At Present H.n. 38
Amrat Nagar Borkheda Police Thana Borkheda District Kota Ra- jasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail, Jhalawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/09/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.606/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar for offences under Sections 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(6), 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(6) of BNS, 2023 and Section 6(1)(b) of Officials Secret Act, 1923.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that though the petitioner has been named in the FIR but the main culprit namely Hemraj has already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.12.2025 along with other co-
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-12166/2026] accused Sunil, Pramod, Murarilal, Mahesh Kumar, Purushottam, Sohel Khan, Mohammed Farukh Khan, Sitaram and Kalu. It is further submitted that other co-accused Jyoti, Seema, Riyaz and Yogendra Singh have also been granted the benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.12.2025. Co- accused Aman and Tosif have been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court itself. He further submits that the present petitioner has been implicated in the present case only on the basis of call detail records and there is no other substantive material connecting him with the alleged offence. The case of the present petitioner is on better footing. Petitioner is behind the bars since 18.07.2025 though five criminal cases have been reported against him, however, in all the cases he is already on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Maksood Khan S/o Shri Mahmood Khan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-12166/2026] learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/59