Rajasthan High Court
CRES/762/2024 of PAPPI DEVI @ PAPITA W/O LATE CHUTTANLAL MEENA, Vs DEVENDRA SINGH GURJAR S/O SAMAYSINGH GURJAR, on 1 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 762/2024 In S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.6215/2017 CNR: RJHC020572382024 | URN: CRES / 1022U / 2024 1. Pappi Devi @ Papita W/o Late Chuttanlal Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-
[2026:RJ-JP:35308]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 762/2024
In
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.6215/2017
CNR: RJHC020572382024 | URN: CRES / 1022U / 2024
1.
Pappi Devi @ Papita W/o Late Chuttanlal Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil- Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
2.
Sonu S/o Late Chuttanlal, Aged About 17 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Pappi Devi, R/o Village- Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
3.
Kumari Khushboo D/o Late Chuttanlal, Aged About 14
Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Pappi Devi, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
4.
Mooli Devi, W/o Ramkishan Meena, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
5.
Ramkishan S/o Late Ramchandra Meena, Aged About 76
Years, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Devendra Singh Gurjar S/o Samaysingh Gurjar, R/o Village-Purodaheli, Post-Kema Kemri, Tehsil-Nadoti, District-Karoli, Rajasthan.(Driver/owner).
2.
New India Assurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, Branch, Dausa.(Insurance Company).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ramdeo Arya for
Mr. Ritesh Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
[2026:RJ-JP:35308]
(2 of 2)
[CRES-762/2024]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/09/2026
1. The matter comes up on application No.1520/2024 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay in filing of the present restoration application.
2. Considering the submissions made and reasons mentioned in the delay condonation application, the same is allowed and consequently, delay in filing the present restoration application is condoned.
3. The present restoration application has been filed on account of non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.02.2024 resulting into passing of the consequential order dated 20.04.2024.
4. Considering the submission made and for the reasons mentioned in the present restoration application, the present restoration application is allowed and as a consequence thereto, S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.6215/2017 is restored to its original number.
5. Office to proceed accordingly. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 35/DIPESH CHAYAL