Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/12865/2026 of DILIP KUMAR S/O THAKUR LAL Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 1 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12865/2026 CNR: RJHC020790392026 | URN: CRLMB / 23706U / 2026 Dilip Kumar S/o Thakur Lal, R/o Ajaypura, P.s. Kumher, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2.
[2026:RJ-JP:35207]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12865/2026
CNR: RJHC020790392026 | URN: CRLMB / 23706U / 2026
Dilip Kumar S/o Thakur Lal, R/o Ajaypura, P.s. Kumher, District Deeg (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.
Gopalprasad S/o Bhagwatprasad, R/o Dhanwada Road Kumher, P.s. Kumher, District Deeg (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Deepak Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
Mr. Jai Prakash Meena
Mr. Jai Kishan Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/09/2026
1. The present misc. bail application has been preferred by the petitioner Dilip Kumar S/o Thakur Lal, under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., 2023, apprehending his arrest in connection with the FIR No. 492/2026 dated 17.07.2026 registered at Police Station Kumher, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 119(1), 326(g), 324(4), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire dispute occurred on account of certain previous disputes which the parties have now resolved and they have entered into compromise which they also submitted to the learned Trial Court. In view of the above, he prayed that the petitioner may be extended the benefit of anticipatory bail.
3. Mr. Jai Prakash Meena, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant submits that the parties have entered into a compromise and he has no objection to the bail application.
[2026:RJ-JP:35207] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12865/2026]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application, however could not dispute the fact of compromise arrived at between the parties.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
6. Considering above noted facts and compromise between the parties, and circumstance of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its powers U/s. 482 of BNSS and deems it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioner-Harun S/o Sammi.
7. Accordingly, these bail application filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of accused-petitioner Dilip Kumar S/o Thakur Lal in connection with the FIR No. 492/2026 dated 17.07.2026 registered at Police Station Kumher, District Deeg, he shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned I.O./S.H.O. on the following conditions:-
(i) he shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required;
(ii) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
(iii) he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 209/RAHUL KUMAR