Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/12279/2026 of MUSTAFA S/O HAKMUDDIN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12279/2026 CNR: RJHC020752422026 | URN: CRLMB / 22590U / 2026 Mustafa S/o Hakmuddin, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Chawandi Khurd, P.s. Shaikhpur Aheer, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj). (Ac- cused At Present

[2026:RJ-JP:35195]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12279/2026

CNR: RJHC020752422026 | URN: CRLMB / 22590U / 2026

Mustafa S/o Hakmuddin, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Chawandi Khurd, P.s. Shaikhpur Aheer, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj). (Ac- cused At Present Confined In Jail Bundi).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Samarth Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

01/09/2026

1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Sec- tion 483 of BNSS in FIR No. 251/2026 registered at Police Station Keshorai Patan District Bundi for offences under Section 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 352 of BNS, 2023.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the name of the petitioner does not find mention in the FIR. It is argued that main allegation of causing life threatening injury is against co-accused Gautam. Petitioner is behind the bars since 21.07.2026 without any criminal past. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose [2026:RJ-JP:35195] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12279/2026] would be served by keeping the petitioner, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner- Mustafa S/o Hakmuddin, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 187/EKTA SAINI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead