Rajasthan High Court
WRW/182/2026 of RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs SHYAM SUNDER S/O SH. PANNA LAL on 1 September 2026
2026:RJ-JP:35065
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 182/2026 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9861/2020 CNR: RJHC020758432026 | URN: WRW / 414U / 2026 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chief Manager, Nagaur. ----Review Petitioner/Applicant/Petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:35065]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 182/2026
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9861/2020
CNR: RJHC020758432026 | URN: WRW / 414U / 2026
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chief Manager, Nagaur.
----Review Petitioner/Applicant/Petitioner
Versus
Shyam Sunder S/o Sh. Panna Lal, Ex-Conductor, Resident Of Behind House Of Bhee Singh Vakil, Laxmipura Post Office, Phalodi, District - Jodhpur.
----Respondent/Non-Applicant
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
01/09/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed by the review petitioner (for short ‘the petitioner’) seeking review of the order dated 14.07.2026 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9861/2020.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the petitioner submits that the amount of cost imposed by this Court is heavy and the same may be modified to some reasonable amount. Learned counsel also submits that he has already complied with the order dated 27.05.2026 passed in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 656/2026.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Page 1 of 2
[2026:RJ-JP:35065] (2 of 2) [WRW-182/2026]
4. The Court, while imposing the cost of Rs. 6,00,000/-, considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case and also the conduct of the petitioner
5. The scope of the Review is very limited, i.e. to correct the error apparent on the record or some arithmetical or typographical error.
6. In view of the submissions made by learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the petitioner, it does not disclose any error apparent on the record and, therefore, this Court finds no ground to review the order dated 14.07.2026.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.
8. All pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Sudha/43
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…