Rajasthan High Court
CW/14109/2010 of RAMAKANT SHARMA AND ANR Vs STATE OF RAJ AND ORS on 1 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14109/2010 CNR: RJHC020175882010 | URN: CW / 23883U / 2010 1. Ramakant Sharma S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Sharma, aged about 34 years, resident of Vilage Khedali Brahmin Post Mainapura, Tehsil Weir District Bharatpur. 2. Shyam Pratap
[2026:RJ-JP:35242]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14109/2010
CNR: RJHC020175882010 | URN: CW / 23883U / 2010
1. Ramakant Sharma S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Sharma, aged about 34 years, resident of Vilage Khedali Brahmin Post Mainapura, Tehsil Weir District Bharatpur.
2. Shyam Pratap Singh Son of Shri Sudhir Chouhan, aged about 24 years, resident of R-346, Civil Lines Behind U.I.T. office Bharatpur
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Chief Executive Officer SLNA-cum Commissioner, Watershed Development and Soil Conservation, Rural Development &
Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Jan Path, Jaipur.
3. Zile Parishad, Bharatpur through its Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur.
4. Project Officer and Executive Engineer (Soil Conservation), District Watershed Development Unit, Bharatpur.
5. Assistant Engineer, Watershed Development Unit, Bharatpur.
6. Panchayat Samiti Weir through its Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Weir, Distt. Bharatpur.
7. Panchayat Samiti Bayana through its Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajendra Soni
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Aditya Sharma for
Mr. Kesar Singh Shekhawat
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/09/2026
1. When the matter was argued on the last date i.e. on 28.01.2026, this Court passed the following order:
[2026:RJ-JP:35242] (2 of 2) [CW-14109/2010] “Being aggrieved by termination of services of the petitioners as WDT Members, this writ petition has been filed by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that although the qualification of possessing engineering degree in civil/agriculture was relaxed by the State Government by way of issuing general order dated 20.02.2008, yet ignoring such relaxation, services of the petitioners were terminated alleging that the petitioners were not qualified. Learned counsel for the respondents is directed to apprise the Court with regard to duration for which WDT Members were appointed by the State Government. Respondents are also required to apprise this Court as to whether the other persons who were also appointed as WDT Members at the relevant time are still continuing or not. Let the matter be listed on 23rd February, 2026.“
2. In compliance of order dated 28.01.2026, the respondents have filed additional affidavit in which it has been specified that the other persons who were earlier appointed as WDT Members at the relevant time, continued only for a period of five years and thereafter they have been discontinued.
3. In view of above, as the similarly situated persons have already been discontinued, no case of discrimination is made out in favour of the petitioners.
4. Hence, under these circumstances, there is no scope of interference and the writ petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 66/NEERU