Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/12492/2026 of ARVIND @ VIJAY S/O SHRI JAGNATH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 1 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12492/2026 CNR: RJHC020764382026 | URN: CRLMB / 23051U / 2026 Arvind @ Vijay S/o Shri Jagnath, Aged 23 Years, R/o Kajipur Police Station Sanbharlek District Jaipur Rural (At Present Confined Sub Jail
[2026:RJ-JP:35121]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12492/2026
CNR: RJHC020764382026 | URN: CRLMB / 23051U / 2026
Arvind @ Vijay S/o Shri Jagnath, Aged 23 Years, R/o Kajipur Police Station Sanbharlek District Jaipur Rural (At Present Confined Sub Jail Sanbharlek District Jaipur).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/09/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No. 124/2026 registered at Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(3) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft of ornaments from the shop of the complainant- Arving @ Vijay. The case is exclusively triable by Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 25.05.2026 though one other case has been reported against him, however in the said case he is bailed out. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the
[2026:RJ-JP:35121] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12492/2026] case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner-Arvind @ Vijay S/o Shri Jagnath, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 65/EKTA