Rajasthan High Court
CMA/876/2022 of MOHAN LAL S/O SHANKARLAL, Vs SHRIRAM S/O HARLAL on 1 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 876/2022 CNR: RJHC020263302022 | URN: CMA / 1395U / 2022 Mohan Lal S/o Shankarlal, Resident Of Mohalla Buchheda Kasba Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1 Shriram S/o Harlal, Resident Of Mohalla
[2026:RJ-JP:35010]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 876/2022
CNR: RJHC020263302022 | URN: CMA / 1395U / 2022
Mohan Lal S/o Shankarlal, Resident Of Mohalla Buchheda Kasba Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Appellant
Versus
Shriram S/o Harlal, Resident Of Mohalla Buchaheda, Kasba Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Rajendra S/o Harlal, Resident Of Mohalla Buchaheda, Kasba Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Omprakash S/o Harlal, Resident Of Mohalla Buchaheda, Kasba Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Sarbati Devi W/o Harlal, Resident Of Mohalla Buchaheda, Kasba Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Ramkunwar S/o Harlal, Resident Of Dhani Motiwali Gaushaala Road, Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
Sub Registrar Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Collector, Jaipur.
Laxmi Devi W/o Rajendra,
Manoj S/o Shri Ram,
Resident Of Mohalla Buchaheda, Kotputli, Dis. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma for
Mr. Deepak Pareek
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Narpat Singh Shekhawat
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/09/2026
1. This misc. appeal under Section 104 read with Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC, has been filed by and on behalf of appellant-plaintiff, feeling aggrieved by dismissal his application for temporary injunction, filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, vide order dated 02.03.2022.
[2026:RJ-JP:35010] (2 of 2) [CMA-876/2022]
2. Counsel for appellant, having instructions of appellant, states that during pendency of present appeal, main suit itself has been decided, therefore, the challenge made in this appeal to the order dated 02.03.2022 has rendered infructuous. Hence, appellant does not want to press this appeal and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. Respondents have no objection.
4. Permission is granted.
5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ S-54