Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11927/2026 of HARIOM S/O SHRI LAJJARAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 1 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11927/2026 CNR: RJHC020718772026 | URN: CRLMB / 21970U / 2026 Hariom S/o Shri Lajjaram, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Noni Thana Jagner Hall Narayan Vihar Colony Hundawal Road Dholpur Thana Nihalganj Distt
[2026:RJ-JP:35181]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11927/2026
CNR: RJHC020718772026 | URN: CRLMB / 21970U / 2026
Hariom S/o Shri Lajjaram, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Noni Thana Jagner Hall Narayan Vihar Colony Hundawal Road Dholpur Thana Nihalganj Distt Dholpur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Dholpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp Raj. High Court Jaipur Bench Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Govind Khandelwal with
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/09/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No. 0224/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur for offences under Section 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The prime allegation allegation to sell a government property which is not situated at the location mentioned in the relevant documents is against main accused Munna Lal. Petitioner is behind the bars since 04.07.2026.
[2026:RJ-JP:35181] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11927/2026] Charge-sheet has already been filed. The investigation/trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner- Hariom S/o Shri Lajjaram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 183/EKTA SAINI