Rajasthan High Court

WRW/49/2026 of BHINV SINGH S/O SHRI BANNE SINGH Vs SECRETARY, RAJASTHAN MUNICIPAL (SUBORDINATES AND MINISTERIAL SERVICE) on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 49/2026 CNR: RJHC020120712026 | URN: WRW / 135U / 2026 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13608/2016 Bhinv Singh S/o Shri Banne Singh, aged about 42 years, R/o Village Post Sujanpura, Via Signrawah, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:35227]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 49/2026

CNR: RJHC020120712026 | URN: WRW / 135U / 2026

In

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13608/2016

Bhinv Singh S/o Shri Banne Singh, aged about 42 years, R/o Village Post Sujanpura, Via Signrawah, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Secretary, Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinates &

Ministerial Service), Selection Commission, G-3, Rajmahal Residency, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur.

2.

Secretary, Local Self Government, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3.

Director & Joint Secreatry, Local Self Government, G-3, Rajmahal Residency, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur.

--Non-Appellants/Respondents

4.

Mahendra Nath S/o Shri Gopal Nath, aged about 31

years, R/o Shrinath Sadan, 835/13, Opposite HMT

Factory, Near New Masjid, Azad Nagar, Ajmer.

5.

Manish Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ram Niwas Meena, aged about 27 Years, R/o House No. 221/12, New Chandra Nagar, Beawar Road, Ajmer.

----Performa Non-Appellants/Petitioners

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

01/09/2026

1. Heard on S.B. Review Petition No.49/2026 filed by the petitioner for seeking review of order dated 21.04.2025 passed by this Court whereby writ petition filed by the petitioner was

[2026:RJ-JP:35227] (2 of 2) [WRW-49/2026] dismissed. This Court has perused order dated 21.04.2025 wherein after considering the fact that the petitioner did not possess the qualification as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Town Planning Service Rules, 1966, (for short the 'Rules of 1966') the writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. It has been specifically recorded in order dated 21.04.2025 that the petitioner has utterly failed to show that he is possessing any experience as required under the Rules of 1966.

2. In view of above, this Court does not find any error apparent in order dated 21.04.2025 therefore, the review petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 61/NEERU

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead