Rajasthan High Court
CCP/619/2019 of MADAN LAL SHARMA S/O SHRI RAM NARAYAN SHARMA Vs SHRI P.K. GOYAL IAS, ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT on 1 September 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 619/2019 CNR: RJHC020319362019 | URN: CCP / 635U / 2019 Madan Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ram Narayan Sharma, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of Manga Ram Bhawan, Manga Ram Colony, Bikaner (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri P.K.
[2026:RJ-JP:35220]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 619/2019
CNR: RJHC020319362019 | URN: CCP / 635U / 2019
Madan Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ram Narayan Sharma, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of Manga Ram Bhawan, Manga Ram Colony, Bikaner (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri P.K. Goyal IAS, Additional Chief Secretary To The Government, Animal Husbandry Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj)
2.
Smt. Roli Singh, IAS, Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Goverment Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj)
3.
Dr. Sailesh Sharma, Director, Directorate Of Animal Husbandry, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj)
4.
State Of Rajasthan Through Its Additional Chief Secretary To The Government, Animal Husbandry Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Mahendra Verma
Mr. Ankit Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Abhishek Sharma with
Mr. Vishal Kumar and
Mr. Divyansh Kumar for
Mr. Manoj Sharma AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/09/2026
1. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, learned counsel for respondents submits that against the order dated 11.12.2018 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3220/2017, non-compliance of which has been alleged in the present contempt petition, a D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.949/2019 titled as State of Rajasthan & Ors.
[2026:RJ-JP:35220] (2 of 2) [CCP-619/2019] Versus Madan Lal Sharma & Ors., was filed by the respondent
- State, which came to be dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.10.2023, of which review was sought by the State by filing D.B. Civil Review Petition No.100/2024, which came to be disposed of vide order dated 19.10.2024, whereby, the directions issued by the learned Single Judge were modified.
2. Learned counsel further submits that thereafter, on account of non-compliance of the order dated 19.10.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court, a contempt petition being D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.506/2025 was filed by the petitioner - Madan Lal Sharma before the Division Bench of this Court, which came to be disposed of vide order dated 18.08.2026 and thus, in view of the same, the present contempt petition does not survive any more.
3. The factum of challenge made by the respondent - State and the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Taking note of the above submissions and the order dated 18.08.2026 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.506/2025, whereby contempt petition has been disposed of after holding that substantial compliance has been made by the respondents, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt petition.
5. Consequently, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 70/DIPESH CHAYAL