Rajasthan High Court
CW/17070/2026 of DR. RANVEER SINGH JAT S/O SHREE RAMESHWAR LAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 31 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17070/2026 CNR: RJHC020818792026 | URN: CW / 35684U / 2026 Dr. Ranveer Singh Jat S/o Shree Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 30, Ashutosh Nagar Ward No. 16, Chomu, Dist. Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of
[2026:RJ-JP:34804]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17070/2026
CNR: RJHC020818792026 | URN: CW / 35684U / 2026
Dr. Ranveer Singh Jat S/o Shree Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 39
Years, R/o 30, Ashutosh Nagar Ward No. 16, Chomu, Dist. Jaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Department Of Personnel, (K-3/complain) Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Director, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Dharmendra Pareek, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
31/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on account of lodging of FIR No.295/2024 dated 18.12.2024 under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 16.12.2024. Learned counsel submits that after conclusion of investigation, charge- sheet has already been filed in a criminal case and investigation is no longer pending.
2. Learned counsel submits that although, charge- sheet under disciplinary rules was also served upon the petitioner, yet the petitioner challenged the same and the proceedings pursuant to charge-sheet has also been stayed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur.
[2026:RJ-JP:34804] (2 of 2) [CW-17070/2026]
3. Learned counsel submits that for last more than one and a half years, the petitioner is under suspension, whereas no fruitful purpose is likely to be achieved by continuing the suspension of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although, the petitioner earlier also submitted representation for reviewing his suspension order, yet the respondents have not considered such representation in the light of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India & Anr. (2015) 7 SCC 291. He submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, directions are given to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner qua his suspension in the light of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary (supra).
5. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation along with aforesaid judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court before the Competent Authority, which shall consider and examine the contents of the representation strictly in accordance with law and shall decide the same within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 16/Jatin