Rajasthan High Court
WRW/181/2026 of GOVIND RAM SAINI S/O SHRI KANA RAM SAINI Vs ICICI BANK LTD. on 31 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Review Petition No.181/2026 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12808/2026 CNR: RJHC020823122026 | URN: WRW / 413U / 2026 Govind Ram Saini S/o Shri Kana Ram Saini, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 14 Jagadamba Nagar, Ajmer Road, Heerapura, Jaipur,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Review Petition No.181/2026
IN
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12808/2026
CNR: RJHC020823122026 | URN: WRW / 413U / 2026
Govind Ram Saini S/o Shri Kana Ram Saini, Aged About 40
Years, R/o 14 Jagadamba Nagar, Ajmer Road, Heerapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302021
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
ICICI Bank Ltd., Branch, Kukarkheda Mandi, Shop No.1 &
2 Near Kukarkh, Kukarkheda Mandi, VKI Road No.12
Sikar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan through its Branch Manager.
2.
DIG, Cyber Crime, Police Headquarters, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ajit Kaswa
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
31/08/2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner and perused the order dated 05.08.2026, wherein, on grievance being raised by the petitioner that on account of alleged disputed transactions in the bank account of the petitioner, it has been freezed by the respondents, this Court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Grievance Redressal Mechanism prescribed in a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Authorities were directed to dispose of the grievance of the petitioner within the timeframe given in the SOP.
(2 of 2) [WRW-181/2026]
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has utterly failed to point out any error apparent on the face of the record, hence, the review petition filed by the petitioner, is hereby, dismissed.
3. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 5/DAKSH