CRLMB/12326/2026 of TASIM SON OF USMAN KHAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 31 August 2026

Order

31/08/2026

1. This criminal bail application has been filed by the petitioner Tasim S/o Usman Khan, aged about 27 years, under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.405/2026 dated 26.07.2026 registered at Police Station Kama, District Deeg, Rajasthan for the offences punishable under Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act, 1959.

2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of any nature except one case registered in the year 2025, which is not of Arms Act. He further submits that no weapon was ever recovered from him in the past. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-12326/2026]

3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that no such cases of similar nature are pending against the accused-petitioner in the past.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the content of the FIR as well as criminal antecedents.

5. This Court, after considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, no recovery is required to be made as the investigation is complete and without making any comments on the merits of the case, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Tasim Son Of Usman Khan shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case.

7. The petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned SHO of the Police Station twice a month for the entire period of the trial. The SHO shall maintain register to mark presence of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to appear twice in any month

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-12326/2026] then the same shall be considered as breach and this bail shall stands cancelled automatically without reference to the Court.

8. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case within a period of two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 97/Monika