Rajasthan High Court
CW/6710/2003 of HARISH CHAND TIKIWAL AND ANR Vs NAGAR NIGAM JAIPUR AND ORS on 31 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6710/2003 CNR: RJHC020223252003 | URN: CW / 12906U / 2003 1. Harish Chand Tikiwal S/o Shri Prahilad Kishan Tikiwal R/o Near Panch Batti, Jaipur 2. Suresh Kumar Goyal S/o Shri Lallu Lal age 35 years, Ownar Babulal Lallu Lal
[2026:RJ-JP:34911]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6710/2003
CNR: RJHC020223252003 | URN: CW / 12906U / 2003
1. Harish Chand Tikiwal S/o Shri Prahilad Kishan Tikiwal R/o Near Panch Batti, Jaipur
2. Suresh Kumar Goyal S/o Shri Lallu Lal age 35 years, Ownar Babulal Lallu Lal 193, Khanda Bai Ji, Johari Bazar, Jaipur
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Nagar Nigam Jaipur Through Chief Secretary/ Commissioner, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Presiding Officer, Additional District Judge No.5, Jaipur City, Jaipur.
3. Presiding Officer, Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) No.4, Jaipur City Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rohan Agarwal for
Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
None Present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
31/08/2026
1. Orders impugned in the present writ petition were passed on the application for temporary injunction, during pendency of Civil Suit No. 102/2000; Harish Chand Tikiwal & Ors. v. Nagar Nigam Jaipur & Ors.
2. As per the status report dated 21.08.2026 sent by the District and Sessions Court, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, the aforesaid Civil Suit No. 102/2000 has finally been disposed of vide judgment dated 07.05.2013. The status report dated 21.08.2026 is taken on record.
[2026:RJ-JP:34911] (2 of 2) [CW-6710/2003]
3. In view of the fact that the original suit, during which the impugned orders came to be passed, has already been disposed of, hence, challenge made to the impugned orders has rendered infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ S-100