Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/13573/2026 of DESHRAJ SON OF ARJUN SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 31 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13573/2026 CNR: RJHC020833712026 | URN: CRLMB / 25105U / 2026 1. Deshraj Son Of Arjun Singh, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Targavon, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Accused
[2026:RJ-JP:34943]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13573/2026
CNR: RJHC020833712026 | URN: CRLMB / 25105U / 2026
1.
Deshraj Son Of Arjun Singh, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Targavon, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur)
2.
Naveen Son Of Natwar Singh, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Targavon, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur)
----Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Balveer Singh Beniwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP
Mr. Bhanu Prakash Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
31/08/2026
1. This instant bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023 in connection with FIR No.213/2026 dated 01.07.2026, registered at Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 304(2) of B.N.S.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are students and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and they have entered into a compromise. In view of above, he prays that the petitioners herein may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however could not dispute the fact that the parties have now entered into a compromise.
[2026:RJ-JP:34943] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13573/2026]
4. Mr. Bhanu Prakash Sharma, learned counsel, appeared on behalf of the complainant, has not disputed the above fact and stated that he has no objection if the present petitioners are enlarged on bail, on account of the compromise entered into between the parties.
4. This Court, after considering the fact that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while allowing the bail application vide order dated 20.08.2026. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is hereby allowed and it is directed that accused- petitioners namely, 1. Deshraj Son Of Arjun Singh 2. Naveen Son Of Natwar Singh shall be released on bail, provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty granted by this Court. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J GAURAV SHARMA/118