Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/5333/2019 of RAKESH KUMAR ARORA S/O SHRI DEVIDITTARAM ARORA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 31 August 2026
2026:RJ-JP:34870
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5333/2019 CNR: RJHC020735992019 | URN: CRLMP / 9837U / 2019 Rakesh Kumar Arora S/o Shri Devidittaram Arora, R/o Ward No.32, Barkat Colony, Hanumangarh, At Present Gali No.1, Surya Nagar, Hanuman Garh Town, Ps
[2026:RJ-JP:34870]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5333/2019
CNR: RJHC020735992019 | URN: CRLMP / 9837U / 2019
Rakesh Kumar Arora S/o Shri Devidittaram Arora, R/o Ward No.32, Barkat Colony, Hanumangarh, At Present Gali No.1, Surya Nagar, Hanuman Garh Town, Ps Hanuman Town, District Hanumangarh, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2.
Suman Arora D/o Shri Ashok Kumar Nagpal B/c Arora, Aged About 41 Years, R/o House No.155, Street No.23, Nai Aabadi, Ps Hanumangarh Town Hall Presently Tenant At House No.a-99-100, Golden City, Chak Jwala Singh Road, Ps Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh, Raj.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv. assisted by
Mr. Snehdeep Khyaliya
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
31/08/2026
1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 13.08.2019 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate No.15, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(B)(K), 376-C and 377 IPC and the petitioner was summoned through arrest warrants.
2. At the outset, it has been apprised to this Court that during pendency of the instant petition, the petitioner was arrested and
Page 1 of 2
[2026:RJ-JP:34870] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5333/2019] granted regular bail by this Court. It has also been apprised to this Court that that after passing of the order impugned, charges have been framed against the petitioner for the above stated offences way back in the year 2022 and the trial has commenced and statements of certain witnesses has also been recorded. Hence, a prayer has been made for passing appropriate orders under the changed circumstances.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record.
5. Considering the above stated facts, this Court is of the considered opinion that under the changed circumstances, the instant petition has become infructuous.
6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
7. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take all ground which have been taken before this Court and all available defence at the appropriate stage of the trial. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/1
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…