Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/10734/2026 of INDRAJ @ TIGER S/O SHRIRAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 31 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10734/2026 CNR: RJHC020643922026 | URN: CRLMB / 19901U / 2026 Indraj @ Tiger S/o Shriram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhani Govindala Tan Raipur, Police Station Patan, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (At Present
[2026:RJ-JP:34857]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10734/2026
CNR: RJHC020643922026 | URN: CRLMB / 19901U / 2026
Indraj @ Tiger S/o Shriram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhani Govindala Tan Raipur, Police Station Patan, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
(At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Khetri).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Accused-
Petitioner
:
Mr. Gajanand Yadav with Mr. Om
Prakash Meena
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
31/08/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0161/2024 registered at Police Station Khetri, District Neem Ka Thana for offence under Sections 132 and 109(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of PDPP Act,1984.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and no specific injury has been attributed to him. Charge sheet has already been filed. Co-accused Ashok @ S.P. against whom 14 cases were reported as antecedents has been granted the benefit of bail by
[2026:RJ-JP:34857] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10734/2026] Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.05.2026. Likewise, co-accused Rahul has also been granted benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.03.2026. The case of the petitioner is on better footing than that of the co- accused. Petitioner is behind the bars since 26.05.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Indraj @ Tiger S/o Shriram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 63/Ritu