Rajasthan High Court
CW/16903/2026 of PRITI KUMARI D/O SHRI ROOP SINGH MEENA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 31 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16903/2026 CNR: RJHC020826052026 | URN: CW / 35333U / 2026 Priti Kumari D/o Shri Roop Singh Meena, Aged About 26 Years, Presently Working As Junior Engineer (Civil), Panchayat Samiti Badi, District Dholpur (Raj.), R/o V/p-
[2026:RJ-JP:34818]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16903/2026
CNR: RJHC020826052026 | URN: CW / 35333U / 2026
Priti Kumari D/o Shri Roop Singh Meena, Aged About 26 Years, Presently Working As Junior Engineer (Civil), Panchayat Samiti Badi, District Dholpur (Raj.), R/o V/p- Mainapura, Tehsil Bhusawar, District- Bharatpur (Raj.). Employee Id- Rjjs202120022243
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj (Panchayati Raj), Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
The Secretary And Commissioner, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Dholpur.
4.
The Development Officer (Vikas Adhikari), Panchayat Samiti Badi, District Dholpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Saurabh Khandppa, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
31/08/2026
1. Grievance of the petitioner is that she was appointed on the post of Junior Engineer (Civil-Diploma Holder), after undergoing due process of recruitment, vide order dated 17.10.2025. Although, while filling application form, it was disclosed by the petitioner that she owns to her credit qualification of B.Tech (Civil Engineering) and even details of documents were also disclosed in the application form, yet after appointment
[2026:RJ-JP:34818] (2 of 2) [CW-16903/2026] aforesaid qualification of the petitioner has not been entered in the service book and records of the petitioner, which is causing grave prejudice and miscarriage of justice to the petitioner for the reasons that acquisition of higher qualification is always beneficial for Junior Engineer so far as grant of additional increments as well as inclusion of name of Junior Engineer in the list of decree holder is concerned. Learned counsel submits that petitioner would be satisfied, in case, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation along with necessary documents before the Competent Authority, which shall consider and pass speaking order on such representation.
2. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation along with necessary documents before the respondent No.2, which shall duly examine the contents of the representation and documents enclosed therewith and shall decide the representation by a speaking and reasoned order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order.
3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 21/Jatin