Rajasthan High Court
CW/12278/2026 of RAGHUVEER JINGONIYA S/O SHRI RAM NIWAS JINGONIYA Vs JOINT SECRETARY on 31 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12278/2026 CNR: RJHC020636382026 | URN: CW / 27191U / 2026 Raghuveer Jingoniya S/o Shri Ram Niwas Jingoniya, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Anatpura, Chimanpura Via Govindgarh Tehsil Chomu Distt. Jaipur Rajasthan - 303712.
[2026:RJ-JP:34878]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12278/2026
CNR: RJHC020636382026 | URN: CW / 27191U / 2026
Raghuveer Jingoniya S/o Shri Ram Niwas Jingoniya, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Anatpura, Chimanpura Via Govindgarh Tehsil Chomu Distt. Jaipur Rajasthan - 303712.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Joint Secretary, To The Government, Finance Department (Insurance) Secretariat Jaipur.
2.
Director, State Insurance And Provident Fund Department Rajasthan Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram Rakh Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
31/08/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has filed this writ petition against order dated 17.04.2026 passed by the Director, State Insurance and Provident Fund Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur, whereby after getting convicted in a criminal case arising out of the provisions of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 the petitioner has been dismissed from service in exercise of powers under Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1958 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Rules of 1958').
2. It is not disputed that the order dated 17.04.2026 is appeallable under Rule 23 of the Rules of 1958, however, no plausible reasons have been mentioned in the memo of writ
[2026:RJ-JP:34878] (2 of 2) [CW-12278/2026] petition for not approaching the Appellate Authority. In view of above, where there is availability of alternative efficacious remedy, this Court does not find any ground to interfere in this writ petition, and the same is hereby dismissed.
3. It is made clear that mere dismissal of this writ petition would not curtail the rights of the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority and in case, the appeal is filed by the petitioner it should be decided strictly in accordance with law.
4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 27/DIVYA