Rajasthan High Court
CW/16929/2026 of SHAHEEN AKHATAR MANSURI S/O SULEMAN MANSURI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 25 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16929/2026 CNR: RJHC020812352026 | URN: CW / 35391U / 2026 Shaheen Akhatar Mansuri S/o Suleman Mansuri, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bust Stand Jotayan, Tehsil Tantoli, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16929/2026
CNR: RJHC020812352026 | URN: CW / 35391U / 2026
Shaheen Akhatar Mansuri S/o Suleman Mansuri, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Bust Stand Jotayan, Tehsil Tantoli, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
The Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur.
4.
The Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur.
5.
The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Amer, District Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with
Mr. Amir Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC
Mr. Bhawani Shankar Gadhveer for
Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, Dy.GC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/08/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed with following prayers: "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the entire record relating to the case of the petitioner and after perusing the same may be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition:-
1. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby quash and set aside the impugned order/circular dated 28.08.2025, to the extent it
(2 of 3) [CW-16929/2026] requires the petitioner to undergo repeated verification/re-assessment of his disability, and declare the same to be illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable in the eyes of law.
2. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents not to compel or insist upon the petitioner to undergo re-assessment of her disability pursuant to the impugned circular dated 28.08.2025.
3. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue to discharge her duties on the post of LDC, in pursuance of the appointment order already issued in her favour, without insisting upon any fresh disability verification during the pendency of the present writ petition or otherwise, unless required in accordance with law.
4. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition stands duly covered by the judgment dated 18.08.2026 passed by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15154/2026 titled as Mithlesh Kumari Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters. Paragraphs 16 to 21 of which reads as under: "16. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present bunch of petitions with direction to the respondents that the requisite medical evaluation of the petitioners shall be carried out at the specified centers, strictly in accordance with the Circular dated 15.07.2026, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
17. The respondents shall ensure that appropriate comfort and consideration is afforded to the petitioners during the said process in light of the guidelines framed qua the afore-quoted circular.
18. It is also clarified that any evaluation carried out in pursuance of earlier circulars shall also be
(3 of 3) [CW-16929/2026] governed by the fate and mechanism of the Circular dated 15.07.2026.
19. To facilitate the said process, the petitioners are at liberty to submit detailed representation(s) before the respective appointing authorities within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
20. To protect the interests of the petitioners during the interregnum, it is directed that for the aforesaid period of 30 days,no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners.
21. Accordingly, the present batch of petitions stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of."
3. The applicability of the said judgment is not disputed by learned counsel for respondents as well and learned counsel submits that the medical evaluation of the petitioners would be strictly carried out in pursuance of the circular dated 15.07.2026 issued by the Department of Personnel.
4. Taking note of the said submissions, the present writ petition stands disposed in the same terms as held in the case of Mithlesh Kumari (supra).
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 11/DIPESH CHAYAL