Rajasthan High Court
CCP/407/2026 of SEEMA JAIN W/O SHRI GAJENDRA JAIN, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 25 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 407/2026 CNR: RJHC020158632026 | URN: CCP / 432U / 2026 Seema Jain W/o Shri Gajendra Jain, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Subhas Park Ke Pass, Aspatal Parisar Ke Uttar Ki Badiya, Chhipabarod, District Baran, Rajasthan.
[2026:RJ-JP:34693]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 407/2026
CNR: RJHC020158632026 | URN: CCP / 432U / 2026
Seema Jain W/o Shri Gajendra Jain, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Subhas Park Ke Pass, Aspatal Parisar Ke Uttar Ki Badiya, Chhipabarod, District Baran, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Shri Joga Ram Jangid, Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.
Shri Trilok Chand Meena, Additional Commissioner-Cum- Government Deputy Secretary (Ii), Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.
Shri Radheyshyam Meel, Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Chhipa Barod, District Baran.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Utkarsh Dubey
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG
Mr. Ashutosh Udawat, AAAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order dated 21.01.2026 passed in S.B. CWP No. 386/2026, whereby the Court stayed the effect and operation of the order dated 17.12.2025, whereby the petitioner was removed from the post of Administrator.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents states that the respondents have issued the order
[2026:RJ-JP:34693] (2 of 2) [CCP-407/2026] dated 24.08.2026 for reinstatement of the petition on the post of Administrator and as soon as the petitioner appears before the concerned Authority, she will be allowed joining. He has also placed before this Court the copy of order dated 24.08.2026, which is taken on record.
3. In view of the issuance of order dated 24.08.2026, in opinion of this Court, the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order, therefore this contempt petition is disposed of.
4. Contempt notices are discharged.
5. However the petitioner would be at liberty to make an application for revival of this contempt petition if the petitioner is not allowed joining on the post of Administrator in furtherance of the order dated 24.8.2026. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/249