Rajasthan High Court
CCP/115/2024 of MAHESH KUMAR KULSHRESHTA S/O SALIGRAM, Vs MR. T. RAVIKANT on 25 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 115/2024 CNR: RJHC020089032024 | URN: CCP / 125U / 2024 Mahesh Kumar Kulshreshta S/o Saligram, Aged About 77 Years, Retired Senior Draftsman, Aged About 77 Years, R/o 34/141 Dhimar Mohalla, B-Narayan Gate, Bharatpur,
[2026:RJ-JP:34696]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 115/2024
CNR: RJHC020089032024 | URN: CCP / 125U / 2024
Mahesh Kumar Kulshreshta S/o Saligram, Aged About 77 Years, Retired Senior Draftsman, Aged About 77 Years, R/o 34/141
Dhimar Mohalla, B-Narayan Gate, Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Mr. T. Ravikant, Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Mr. Mansingh Meena, Secretary (R.a.s.) U.i.t, Kota, Rajasthan.
3.
Mr. Kamal Ram Meena, Secretary (R.a.s.) U.i.t. Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
4.
Dr. Harphool Singh Yadav, Secretary Uit Kota (Now Commissioner, Kota Development Authority) Kota (Raj.).
5.
Kanishk Katariya, Secretary Uit Bharatpur (Now Commissioner, Bharatpur Development Authority Bharatpur (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Kumar Singhal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG, alongwith
Mr. Vishal Kumar, AAAG, for R.1
Mr. Satya Narayan Kumawat &
Ms. Vipra Khatri, for R. 2 & 4
Mr. Dharmendra Agarwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents have made due compliance of the order of the Court, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition.
[2026:RJ-JP:34696] (2 of 2) [CCP-115/2024] In view of the statements made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices are discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/252