Rajasthan High Court
CCP/715/2026 of MEWA SINGH S/O SHRI POORNARAM, Vs SH. ARUN GARG on 25 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 715/2026 CNR: RJHC020368462026 | URN: CCP / 752U / 2026 Mewa Singh S/o Shri Poornaram, R/o Bola Ki Dhani, Tehsil Mandrella, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Sh. Arun Garg, District Collector,
[2026:RJ-JP:34691]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 715/2026
CNR: RJHC020368462026 | URN: CCP / 752U / 2026
Mewa Singh S/o Shri Poornaram, R/o Bola Ki Dhani, Tehsil Mandrella, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Sh. Arun Garg, District Collector, Jhunjhunu, Collectorate Building, Collectorate Road, Jhunjhunu.
2.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Nitesh Pareek
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Chaudhary
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/08/2026
1. This contempt petition is filed alleging non-compliance of order dated 12.11.2025.
2. By the order dated 12.11.2025, the Court directed the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner has been decided by a reasoned and speaking order dated 24.08.2026 and the same has been placed before this Court, which is taken on record.
4. In view of the fact that the representation of the petitioner has been decided, the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court.
[2026:RJ-JP:34691] (2 of 2) [CCP-715/2026]
5. Hence this contempt petition is disposed of.
6. Contempt notices are discharged.
7. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to assail the order dated 24.08.2026 before the appropriate forum if he feels aggrieved by the same. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/224