Rajasthan High Court

CW/16486/2026 of SUNITA WIFE OF JAI SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 25 August 2026

2026:RJ-JP:34640

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16486/2026 CNR: RJHC020809762026 | URN: CW / 34693U / 2026 Sunita Wife of Jai Singh, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Bhambhori, Panchayati Samiti, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through

[2026:RJ-JP:34640]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16486/2026

CNR: RJHC020809762026 | URN: CW / 34693U / 2026

Sunita Wife of Jai Singh, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Bhambhori, Panchayati Samiti, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.)

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

Additional Commissioner Cum Deputy Secretary (Second), Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

3.

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur (Raj.)

4.

Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Jhotwara, District Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Mahesh Gupta

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Order

25/08/2026

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner relies upon the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of "Mahaveer Prasad Gautam vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors." (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3422/2025) along with other connected matters, dated 18.08.2025. The judgment relates to several cases which have been decided by a common judgment.

2. Prima facie this Court finds that the petitioner was not selected and did not undergo any process for appointment as an Administrator and there were complaints against her functioning

Page 1 of 2

[2026:RJ-JP:34640] (2 of 2) [CW-16486/2026] which resulted in her being eased out of the office. The Officer of the Government is posted to take overall care of the concerned administration and no rights are created nor there is any post of Administrator as such under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

3. In view thereto, no case for interference is made out. The present Civil Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.

4. All pending applications stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ Amit/88

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead