Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1131/2024 of PRYAGWATI W/O SHRI BABU LAL, Vs SHRI KULDEEP RANKA, SECRETARY on 25 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1131/2024 CNR: RJHC020992132024 | URN: CCP / 1222U / 2024 Pryagwati W/o Shri Babu Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Isarda, Gopal Mandir Ke Pas, District Sawai Madhopur, Presently Post Rasoiya Hostel, Isarda District Sawai
[2026:RJ-JP:34697]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1131/2024
CNR: RJHC020992132024 | URN: CCP / 1222U / 2024
Pryagwati W/o Shri Babu Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Isarda, Gopal Mandir Ke Pas, District Sawai Madhopur, Presently Post Rasoiya Hostel, Isarda District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Bachnesh Agarwal, Director/aayukat, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, 22 Godown Ke Paas, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.
Secretay Through Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Secretariat Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Nidhi Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG
Mr. Ashutosh Udawat, AAAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order dated 21.09.2023 passed in S.B. CWP No. 2187/2020,
2. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents have issued necessary orders for sanction of the minimum of the pay scale as directed by this Court, subject to the outcome of the SLP pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court. He also placed before this Court the order dated 24.08.2026.
[2026:RJ-JP:34697] (2 of 2) [CCP-1131/2024]
3. In view of issuance of order dated 24.08.2026, in opinion of this Court, the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order.
4. Accordingly this contempt petition is disposed of.
5. Contempt notices are discharged.
6. In case the due benefits are not extended to the petitioner in furtherance of the order dated 24.08.2026 within a period of 15 days, the petitioner would be at liberty to make an application for revival of this contempt petition. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/253