Rajasthan High Court

CW/16908/2026 of RAGHUNANDAN SANKRITYA S/O SHRI SAJJAN KUMAR SANKRITYA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16908/2026 CNR: RJHC020829712026 | URN: CW / 35348U / 2026 Raghunandan Sankritya S/o Shri Sajjan Kumar Sankritya, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 465, Ward No. 24, Opposite Parshuram Bhawan, Ratangarh, Churu Rajasthan. Presently

[2026:RJ-JP:34463]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16908/2026

CNR: RJHC020829712026 | URN: CW / 35348U / 2026

Raghunandan Sankritya S/o Shri Sajjan Kumar Sankritya, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 465, Ward No. 24, Opposite Parshuram Bhawan, Ratangarh, Churu Rajasthan. Presently Posted As Resource Person, Office Of Chief Block Education Officer, Block Jaipur West, Dist. Jaipur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rishi Raj Maheshwari

Ms. Apoorva Agarwal

Mr. Jatin Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Ms. Dhriti Laddha

for Mr. Rajendra Prasad, AG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

25/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by way of the present petition the impugned transfer order dated 17.08.2026 has been assailed. It is prayed that in similar facts and circumstances, after taking note of material akin aspects, and circumstances as addressed by learned counsel representing various parties, a batch of petitions was decided, wherein SBCWP No.14009/2026 titled as Dr. Mahesh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. was the lead petition; and thus the present

[2026:RJ-JP:34463] (2 of 2) [CW-16908/2026] petition be decided in light of the ratio passed in Dr. Mahesh Meena (supra). Learned counsel for the respondents has not refuted the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the submissions made, the present petition is disposed of in the light of Dr. Mahesh Meena (supra); it is made clear that the order passed therein shall be fully applicable on mutatis mutandis basis on the present petition. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J 15/CHANDAN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead