Rajasthan High Court

CW/16957/2026 of NADEEM AHMED SON OF ISHTIYAQUE AHMED, Vs UNION OF INDIA on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16957/2026 CNR: RJHC020826192026 | URN: CW / 35431U / 2026 Nadeem Ahmed Son Of Ishtiyaque Ahmed, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Moriyo Ki Gali, Mohalla Sadat Malpura, Tonk, Rajasthan, Presently Residing At P.no. 5, Near

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16957/2026

CNR: RJHC020826192026 | URN: CW / 35431U / 2026

Nadeem Ahmed Son Of Ishtiyaque Ahmed, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Moriyo Ki Gali, Mohalla Sadat Malpura, Tonk, Rajasthan, Presently Residing At P.no. 5, Near Jayda Masjid, Rahiman Colony, Delhi Bypass, Jaipur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Union Of India, Through The Secretary Dept Of Health And Family Welfare Room No. 156, A Wing, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110011.

2.

Deputy Director Spl Gr Ii (Emr) Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Health Services Directorate (Emergency Medical Relief) Nirmaan Bhawan, New Delhi-110011.

3.

Nodal Officer Cum Additional Director, (R.h.) Headquarter, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Jaipur-302005

(Raj.).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Iliyas Khan

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Lalit Bhardwaj for

Mr. Samit Bishnoi

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

24/08/2026

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore humbly prayed that Your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:-

1. Action of the respondents in not selecting/nominating the application of the petitioner for Haj deputation-2027 despite of being eligible and

(2 of 3) [CW-16957/2026] entitled may kindly be quashed and set aside and further respondents may kindly be directed to forward/nominate the application of the applicant for Haj deputation-2027 and further respondent MoHFW may kindly be directed to send the applicant for Haj deputation-2027 as per his eligibility/selection.

2. That the respondents may kindly be directed to make suitable provisions in guidelines for Haj deputation (who are submitted application since last 3 years) for selecting them without any lottery or any other procedure

and

their applications/candidature be selected for Haj deputation on the basis of number of years only.

3. That the respondents be directed to shortlist the candidates in fair and transparent after following the guidelines.

4. The respondents may kindly be directed to formulate a fair and transparent guidelines in short listing the application/applicants for Haj deputation.

5. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner."

2. Mr. Iliyas Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that as the petitioner is working as a Nursing Officer, he has all the eligibility for the Haj deputation 2027, for which, even an application has been duly filed by him.

3. Learned counsel submits that the last date for submission of application is 28.08.2026 and the same would be finalized by the respondents within a period of seven days thereafter.

4. Learned counsel further submits that the application filed by the petitioner be considered objectively by the respondents in view of the "Eligibility criteria & General conditions for Haj Deputation".

5. Taking note of the same, issue notice to the respondents.

(3 of 3) [CW-16957/2026]

6. Mr. Lalit Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Samit Bishnoi, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents.

7. Hence, service is complete.

8. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case the petitioner has already filed the application, the same would be duly considered in accordance with the applicable guidelines and the petitioner has no occasion to apprehend his non-consideration subject to applicability of the eligibility criteria and applicable terms and conditions.

9. In view of the same, the writ petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondents to duly consider the application filed by the petitioner for Haj deputation, 2027 on or before 04.09.2026, in accordance with law.

10. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

11. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide petitioner's application strictly in accordance with law and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the same in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /17

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead