Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/6706/2026 of BANTI SON OF JAGANNATH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6706/2026 CNR: RJHC020403472026 | URN: CRLMB / 12121U / 2026 Banti Son of Jagannath, Resident of Gajjipura, Police Station Badi, Sadar, District Dholpur (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6706/2026
CNR: RJHC020403472026 | URN: CRLMB / 12121U / 2026
Banti Son of Jagannath, Resident of Gajjipura, Police Station Badi, Sadar, District Dholpur (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. R.R. Baisla
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/08/2026
1. Instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No.59/2023 registered at Police Station Basaidang, District Dholpur for offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 307, 399 & 402 of the IPC, Sections 11 of the Rajasthan Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1986 and Sections 3(1), 25(1)(b), 5(1)(A), 25(1)(a), 25(6) & 25(7) of the Arms act.
2. Counsel for accused-petitioner submits that petitioner has better case than the other three co-accused persons namely Ramlakhan, Rajendra and Udaibhan, who have already been released on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B Civil Misc. Bail Application No.13773/2023 vide order dated 01.12.2023; after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed; petitioner is in custody
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6706/2026] since 06.09.2023 and conclusion of trial will take its considerable time, hence, petitioner be released on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
4. Heard counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Taking into consideration facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that other three co-accused persons namely Ramlakhan, Rajendra and Udaibhan, have already been released on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B Civil Misc. Bail Application No.13773/2023 vide order dated 01.12.2023; after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed; petitioner is in custody since 06.09.2023 and conclusion of trial will take its considerable time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Banti Son of Jagannath, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
7. In addition, keeping in mind the previous pendency of cases against the petitioner for similar nature of offence, it is directed that he shall not repeat the similar offence and would mark his presence before the concerned Police Station in the first week of every three months. The concerned SHO shall record his presence in the Rojnamcha. In case, petitioner is found involved in similar offence, during bail granted by this Court or breach of this
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-6706/2026] condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail, granted by this Court. (SUDESH BANSAL), J 79/NITIN