Rajasthan High Court
CW/16932/2026 of BHURI SINGH S/O SHRI SONPAL SINGH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16932/2026 CNR: RJHC020827592026 | URN: CW / 35394U / 2026 Bhuri Singh S/o Shri Sonpal Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Mohlla Januthar District Deeg Raj ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Peincipal
[2026:RJ-JP:34181]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16932/2026
CNR: RJHC020827592026 | URN: CW / 35394U / 2026
Bhuri Singh S/o Shri Sonpal Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Mohlla Januthar District Deeg Raj
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Peincipal Secretary, Forest Department Govt. Of Rajasthan , Govt.
Secretariate, Jaipur Rajasthan
2.
The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest (Pccf), Jhalana Doongari, Jaipur
3.
The District Chief Conservator Of Forest, Deeg District Deeg Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Mahi Choudhary
for Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by way of the present petition the impugned transfer order dated 10.07.2026 has been assailed. It is prayed that in similar facts and circumstances, after taking note of material akin aspects, and circumstances as addressed by learned counsel representing various parties, a batch of petitions was decided, wherein SBCWP No.14009/2026 titled as Dr. Mahesh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. was the lead petition; and thus the present petition be decided in light of the ratio passed in Dr. Mahesh Meena (supra).
[2026:RJ-JP:34181] (2 of 2) [CW-16932/2026] Learned counsel for the respondents has not refuted the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the submissions made, the present petition is disposed of in the light of Dr. Mahesh Meena (supra); it is made clear that the order passed therein shall be fully applicable on mutatis mutandis basis on the present petition. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J 75/CHANDAN