Rajasthan High Court
CW/16632/2026 of PARTH GOUR S/O SHRI GOPAL SHARMA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16632/2026 CNR: RJHC020766142026 | URN: CW / 34920U / 2026 Parth Gour S/o Shri Gopal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Near Charbhuja Mandir, Mouzmabad, District Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan,
[2026:RJ-JP:34149]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16632/2026
CNR: RJHC020766142026 | URN: CW / 34920U / 2026
Parth Gour S/o Shri Gopal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Near Charbhuja Mandir, Mouzmabad, District Jaipur, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Director, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan Jaipur, Block No.6, Shiksha Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
3.
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Rajasthan State Agriculture Management Primises, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan Through Its Secretary.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/08/2026
1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayers: "a) by an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents may kindly be directed to correct the Final Answer Key dated 01.06.2026 by recording the correct answer of Question No. 56 as option (A) & Question No. 65 as option (A);
b) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to delete Question No.76 and 113 from the said examination, being out of the prescribed Syllabus, and to proportionately distribute the marks of the said deleted questions amongst the
[2026:RJ-JP:34149] (2 of 2) [CW-16632/2026] remaining valid questions of the concerned paper;
c) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to restore Question No.88 in the Final Answer Key with its correct answer as option (A);
d) consequent to the reliefs prayed above, the respondents may kindly be directed to re- evaluate and revise the result of the petitioner and declare the revised final merit list, and grant appointment to the petitioner on the post of Upper Primary School Teacher Level-2 (Sanskrit Education) under GEN-EWS category, in pursuance of the Advertisement No.9/2025 dated 6.11.2025, with all consequential benefits;
e) any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioner."
2. Heard.
3. Having heard the submissions advanced, and upon a perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of a view that the petitioner herein has not availed the remedy of raising objections before the respondents at appropriate time, i.e. at the time of provisional list, and after participating in the examination process, at a belated stage has approached this Court.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J 49/DEEPAK